1987
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1987.1096739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Joint Symbol and Frame Synchronization for Direct-Detection Optical Communication Systems

Abstract: The problem of joint symbol and frame synchronization in direct-detection optical PPM communication systems under the assumption of known slot timing is considered here. The optimum maximum-likelihood (ML) and sub-optimum rules for this joint symbol and frame synchronization problem are derived. The reason of Georghiades's (1985) incorrect ML rule is discussed in this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted, as the figure indicates, that because the number of allowed synchronization pattern starting positions is large compared to the length of the synchronization pattern, the detection performances of the correlation and the periodic ML rules are poor even at high SNR. This performance limit is the random data limited (RDL) upper bound for periodic frame synchronization, which is given as [12] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, as the figure indicates, that because the number of allowed synchronization pattern starting positions is large compared to the length of the synchronization pattern, the detection performances of the correlation and the periodic ML rules are poor even at high SNR. This performance limit is the random data limited (RDL) upper bound for periodic frame synchronization, which is given as [12] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that although the coordination of BSs in the considered network needs high-speed connections between BSs for exchanging information, this is possible in the coordinated multi-point (CoMP) scenarios with cloud radio access networks (C-RANs) and/or remote radio heads (RRHs) [33]. 1 In addition, since the CoMP scenario is envisioned for networks with small cells where large number of low-power devices, e.g., IoT devices, are expected to exist [34], such CoMP scenario consideration for realizing our proposed cell search approach indeed greatly matches our goal in this paper that the overhead of UEs should be offloaded to BSs.…”
Section: Proposed Cell Search Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conduct the initial cell search, we first need to conduct the time and frequency synchronization. Specifically, the time synchronization includes both symbol time synchronization and frame time synchronization, where the BS and the UE need to work collaboratively on synchronizing their symbol timing and frame timing [1]. Frequency synchronization is to synchronize the carrier frequency between the BS and UE, as the frequency mismatch between them could happen due to the oscillator mismatch, Doppler shift, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frame synchronization refers to the problem of locating a sync pattern periodically embedded into data and received over a channel (see, e.g., [4], [3], [6], [5]). In [4] Massey considered the situation of binary data transmitted across a white Gaussian noise channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%