On justification of efficient Energy-Force parameters of Hydraulic-excavator main mechanisms

Komissarov, A.P.; Lagunova, Yuliya; Шестаков, В. С.; Lukashuk, O. A.

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/323/1/012015

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a direct relationship between the pitch length and the height of the excavator's center of mass. In addition, when the dragline is moved by the thrust cylinders, the trailing edge of the base is loaded, forming an extra resistance to movement [2,3]. To solve these problems in the mechanism [4], a technical decision was made to install a sliding support in the support shoes, as in the four-support walking mechanism of THE esh-100.100 excavator [5].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of the working area of a hydraulic excavator

Suslov

Chernukhin

2020

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the mechanisms of walking used on dragline excavators. The disadvantages of each mechanism are identified and based on this, the most promising movement mechanism is selected – a three-legged walking mechanism with a hydraulic drive. For this mechanism, the main disadvantages are also identified. The following is a technical solution that allows you to save this mechanism from the main drawback – the need to raise the center of mass of the excavator to a significant height to ensure the maximum step value. The technical solution includes the presence of a flat hydrostatic support that allows to increase the efficiency of the mechanism in open-pit mining operations. The calculation of oil consumption through a flat hydrostatic support in the conditions of its use on quarry soils with different bearing capacity is made.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%