2005
DOI: 10.1515/crll.2005.2005.589.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On K3 correspondences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general M is not a fine moduli space, that is a universal sheaf does not exist. However a quasi-universal sheaf E does exist such that E | X×m F m 2 where F m is a representative of the isomorphism class of bundles corresponding to m [15].…”
Section: Which Sends a Maximal Isotropic Subspace To The Ideal It Genmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general M is not a fine moduli space, that is a universal sheaf does not exist. However a quasi-universal sheaf E does exist such that E | X×m F m 2 where F m is a representative of the isomorphism class of bundles corresponding to m [15].…”
Section: Which Sends a Maximal Isotropic Subspace To The Ideal It Genmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the conjecture could be verified in a number of other situations (see e.g. [14,35]), but turned out to be wrong in general (see [30,Ex. 4.11]).…”
Section: Any Fourier-mukai Transform φmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there does not exist a universal sheaf E on X × M such that E | X×m ≃ E m where E m is the isomorphism class of sheaves corresponding to m in M. However a quasi-universal sheaf does exist. An explicit construction of a quasi-universal sheaf is in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%