1978
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620120307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On least squares approximations to indefinite problems of the mixed type

Abstract: SUMMARYA least squares method is presented for computing approximate solutions of ipdefinite partial differential equations of the mixed type such as those that arise in connection with transonic flutter analysis. The method retains the advantages of finite difference schemes namely simplicity and sparsity of the resulting matrix system. However, it offers some great advantages over finite difference schemes. First, the method is insensitive to the value of the forcing frequency, i.e., the resulting matrix sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method, which represents the beginning of LSFEM for first-order systems, was proposed in the pioneering papers of Lynn and Arya (1973) and Zienkiewicz et al (1974) and later developed and investigated by Fix and Gunzburger (1978), Fix et al (1979), and Cox and Fix (1984). The conventional LSFEM has a significant advantage over the mixed Galerkin method 112 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, which represents the beginning of LSFEM for first-order systems, was proposed in the pioneering papers of Lynn and Arya (1973) and Zienkiewicz et al (1974) and later developed and investigated by Fix and Gunzburger (1978), Fix et al (1979), and Cox and Fix (1984). The conventional LSFEM has a significant advantage over the mixed Galerkin method 112 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, least-squares finite element methods in these settings are among the best understood, studied, and tested from both the theoretical and computational viewpoints. Our discussion will also include least-squares methods for convection-diffusion and other second-order elliptic problems (see [6], [24], [26], [33], [35], [38], [42]- [45], [48], [52], [62], [71], [72], [75], [86], [95], [106], [107], and [104]), linear elasticity (see [34], [36], and [37]), inviscid, compressible flows (see [61], [64], [67], [99], and [118]), and electromagnetics (see [46], [58], [60], [97], and [116]. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stabilized method (29) can be viewed as a weighted average of the unstable mixed method (13) and (14) and the stable Galerkin method (27). Alternatively, we can view (29) as obtained by adding the weak residual…”
Section: Galerkin Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we focus on four different possibilities to accomplish this. The first one is to use the classical least-squares approach for the first-order system (1), (2), and (3), formulated in [14,15,18]. The second is to stabilize the mixed problem by using the residual of (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%