1994
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(94)90015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On limiting the market for status signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
131
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…3 While Veblens work was rich in illustrating manifold facets of status-seeking behavior, the present paper takes a more narrow approach to positional concerns by investigating spending on highly visible goods suited to signal one's usually unobserved wealth. The basic idea has been elaborated in different signaling status models (Ireland 1994, Cole, Mailath, and Postlewaite 1995, Glazer and Konrad 1996, Corneo and Jeanne 1998, to mention a few). In accordance with such models, Charles, Hurst, and Roussanov (2009) derive a simple signaling framework for empirically investigating visible consumption.…”
Section: Related Literature and Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 While Veblens work was rich in illustrating manifold facets of status-seeking behavior, the present paper takes a more narrow approach to positional concerns by investigating spending on highly visible goods suited to signal one's usually unobserved wealth. The basic idea has been elaborated in different signaling status models (Ireland 1994, Cole, Mailath, and Postlewaite 1995, Glazer and Konrad 1996, Corneo and Jeanne 1998, to mention a few). In accordance with such models, Charles, Hurst, and Roussanov (2009) derive a simple signaling framework for empirically investigating visible consumption.…”
Section: Related Literature and Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men face a trade-o¤ between investing in their survival, and conspicuous consumption that signals their quality and thus increases their matching probability. Much of the theory emphasizes the role of status goods as signals of income (Bagwell and Bernheim 1996;Corneo and Jeanne 1997;Frank 1985Frank , 1986Ireland 1994Ireland , 1998Ireland , 2001; Glazer and Konrad 1996; Moav and Neeman 2012) often with consideration of the role of the income of potential grooms in the context of marriage matching. 3 Men may incur debt to provide a dishonest signal of their desirability as a mate (Gallup and Frederick 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a usual result in the literature (e.g. Ireland, 1994Ireland, , 1998Ireland, , 2001, except that in our model it arises with endogenous relative concerns. Looking at how changes with is not very informative about the after-tax distribution of incomes, since e¤orts (and then output) respond to .…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 79%