2001
DOI: 10.1002/nav.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On‐line algorithms for minimizing makespan on batch processing machines

Abstract: Abstract:We consider the problem of scheduling jobs on-line on batch processing machines with dynamic job arrivals to minimize makespan. A batch processing machine can handle up to B jobs simultaneously. The jobs that are processed together form a batch, and all jobs in a batch start and complete at the same time. The processing time of a batch is given by the longest processing time of any job in the batch. Each job becomes available at its arrival time, which is unknown in advance, and its processing time be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm performs better than the one given in [13], which has a competitive ratio of 3 2 . It would be interesting to find out whether for the problem under study there is an on-line algorithm with a competitive ratio matching the lower bound 1 + γ 2 ≈ 1.325 provided in [14], or whether the lower bound can be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The algorithm performs better than the one given in [13], which has a competitive ratio of 3 2 . It would be interesting to find out whether for the problem under study there is an on-line algorithm with a competitive ratio matching the lower bound 1 + γ 2 ≈ 1.325 provided in [14], or whether the lower bound can be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to the results of [14], there does not exist any on-line algorithm for the problem with a competitive ratio smaller than 1 + γ 2 , where γ 2 ≈ 0.325 is a solution of the equation (1 + γ 2 ) 3 = γ 2 + 2. We provide an on-line algorithm for the problem that is better than the one given in [13]. In fact, our algorithm improves the competitive ratio from …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are summarized in Table 1. A number of researchers have studied the traditional parallel-batching scheduling problems that are under centralized situation (Deng et al 2003;Lee et al 1992;Lee and Uzsoy 1999;Ng et al 2003;Potts and Kovalyov 2000;Uzsoy 1994;Zhang et al 2001). Scheduling problem P|b < n|C max is N P−hard in the strong sense even for b = 1 (Lageweg et al 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When c ≥ 2, since the number of jobs n is not known in advance, we cannot assign all the jobs into n c delivery batches as in Step 2 of algorithm A 1 . In fact, by considering the vehicle as a batch-processing machine with the capacity c, the remaining job delivery problem is equivalent to an on-line batch-processing scheduling problem considered by Zhang et al (2001) as follows: All jobs arrive over time, i.e., each job and its processing time become available at its arrival time. There is a batch-processing machine which can handle up to c ≥ 2 jobs simultaneously.…”
Section: Preemptive Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%