2002
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2001.1460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Line and Indirect Tool Wear Monitoring in Turning With Artificial Neural Networks: A Review of More Than a Decade of Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
160
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(323 reference statements)
0
160
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been significant interest in tool condition monitoring in the recent past (Byrne et al 1995;Chao and Hwang 1997;Jemielniak et al 1998;Sick 2002;Rehorn et al 2005;Audy 2006;Wang et al 2008;Purushothaman 2009). Various indirect methods for tool condition monitoring (TCM), which use a pattern in sensor data to detect a failure mode (Byrne et al 1995;Scheffer and Heyns 2004;Heyns 2007), have been tried and tested by modeling the correlation between tool wear and sensory signals, namely the cutting force, torque, current, power, vibration, acoustic emission and airborne sound pressure acquired in machining processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There has been significant interest in tool condition monitoring in the recent past (Byrne et al 1995;Chao and Hwang 1997;Jemielniak et al 1998;Sick 2002;Rehorn et al 2005;Audy 2006;Wang et al 2008;Purushothaman 2009). Various indirect methods for tool condition monitoring (TCM), which use a pattern in sensor data to detect a failure mode (Byrne et al 1995;Scheffer and Heyns 2004;Heyns 2007), have been tried and tested by modeling the correlation between tool wear and sensory signals, namely the cutting force, torque, current, power, vibration, acoustic emission and airborne sound pressure acquired in machining processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Byrne et al 1995;Sick 2002;Rehorn et al 2005;Heyns 2007). In general, cutting force is considered one of the most significant variables in the turning process (Sick 2002;Scheffer and Heyns 2004). Worn tools generally cause an increase in the static as well as dynamic components of the three orthogonal cutting force components, because of increased friction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations