2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/vppc.2011.6043022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line battery identification for electric driving range prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are various methods for capacity estimation, most of them can be grouped into one of the two broad categories: openloop [3][4][5][6] and closed-loop [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] methods. Systems in which the output has no effect upon the input are used for open-loop methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are various methods for capacity estimation, most of them can be grouped into one of the two broad categories: openloop [3][4][5][6] and closed-loop [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] methods. Systems in which the output has no effect upon the input are used for open-loop methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to estimate the driving range for EVs to minimize the effect of driver's range anxiety and to promote the popularization of EVs [196]. A driving range estimation algorithm helps EV drivers to make effective decision on driving, charging and parking.…”
Section: Range Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on published new and existing EV parameters, the simplified power train models are created and then compared with each other according to their range characteristics. In [196,202], lithium-ion and lead-acid battery models are developed respectively for driving range prediction. Both studies investigated the behaviors of batteries related to different driving styles and analyzed the relationship between the batteries and the residual range.…”
Section: Range Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total altitude difference on the path Vrbani -SljemeSamobor -Vrbani was 859 m (Fig 5 and 6). The measurement started in the third gear of transmission with a fully loaded battery ( [9], [10]). Just before starting the incline the gear was shifted into the second and soon returned into the third gear because the motor was not overloaded even in the third gear of the transmission system.…”
Section: Measurements Done With the Converted Evmentioning
confidence: 99%