2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line head loss identification for monitoring of pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, computer-based methods for leak location in pipelines, assume that the quasi-static friction is constant, however, this is not true (Rojas et al, 2018) as this parameter changes with time. An accurate value of the friction factor would improve the performance of leak detection methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, computer-based methods for leak location in pipelines, assume that the quasi-static friction is constant, however, this is not true (Rojas et al, 2018) as this parameter changes with time. An accurate value of the friction factor would improve the performance of leak detection methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The head losses promoted by the constituents of the system, fluid characteristics, flow velocity, and external factors of the exposed environment (e.g., temperature and pressure) result in water application efficiency (Sousa & Dantas Neto, 2014; Wu et al, 2014; Chamba, Zubelzu, & Juana, 2019). Adding to the intrinsic effects of each factor, the head loss can have additional consequences such as great losses in water delivery and changes in the quality of the pipes (Rojas et al, 2018), making the irrigation project even more inefficient (Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%