2022
DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.12639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On‐line identification model for single phase‐earth fault in distribution network driven by wavelet transform and multi‐learner combination

Abstract: The detection of single phase‐earth faults has been a difficult task for a long time due to its very low current in high impedance grounded fault especially in a neutral un‐effectively grounded system. To address this issue, this paper firstly proposes multi‐learner based single phase‐earth fault identification models. First, to erase disturb noise in fault recording profiles, a denoising model is put forward based on the wavelet transform optimized via the proposed threshold improvement approach. Second, feat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In real‐world scenarios, single‐phase earth faults present complicated and extremely changeable, where most of the current mainstream algorithms in this field merely fit the parts of these scenarios, due to their imperfect performance in representing fault characteristic. To fill this gap, our previous research [27] has conducted many studies and then put forward the method that constructs a set of fault features, about 16‐dimension, for example, three‐phase voltages, three‐phase currents, zero‐sequence voltage, zero‐sequence current, and zero‐sequence angle difference feature, which can enrich fault features and finally form an entire and valid feature engineering system taking into account stable/transient features of faulty network.…”
Section: Feature Dataset and Kpca Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real‐world scenarios, single‐phase earth faults present complicated and extremely changeable, where most of the current mainstream algorithms in this field merely fit the parts of these scenarios, due to their imperfect performance in representing fault characteristic. To fill this gap, our previous research [27] has conducted many studies and then put forward the method that constructs a set of fault features, about 16‐dimension, for example, three‐phase voltages, three‐phase currents, zero‐sequence voltage, zero‐sequence current, and zero‐sequence angle difference feature, which can enrich fault features and finally form an entire and valid feature engineering system taking into account stable/transient features of faulty network.…”
Section: Feature Dataset and Kpca Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, these detecting approaches can be mainly categorized into three branches: injection method, steady‐state method, and transient method [5–9]. Considering that the advantages and drawbacks among them have in deep discussed and in detailed analyzed in our previous work [10], here only their basic concepts and the principals used in detecting single phase‐earth faults are provided and summarized in this section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%