2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line optimization of four-zone simulated moving bed chromatography using an Equilibrium-Dispersion Model: II. Experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive experimental validation of the on-line optimization concept is presented in a second part considering the separation of two bicalutamide enantiomers as a case study [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive experimental validation of the on-line optimization concept is presented in a second part considering the separation of two bicalutamide enantiomers as a case study [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMB parameters will be estimated globally by a Software-In-the-Loop (SIL) scheme solved by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in Matlab connected to the SMB phenomenological models in gProms, each isotherm at a time. Lee; Kienle; Seidel-Morgenstern (2020a, 2020b) and Lee; Seidel-Morgenstern (2019) applied an equilibrium dispersion cell model with nonlinear adsorption isotherms based on online optimization that does not need to solve the PDAE, but nonlinear equations “cell-by-cell”. On the other hand, here, parameters will be estimated globally by the SIL scheme solved by orthogonal colocation in 20 intervals, using second-order polynomials with two collocation points in a 1 Tb Ryzen 7 laptop. This procedure is performed four times, one for each ξ k .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially challenging in the optimization process where the simulations of SMB processes under various operation conditions must be repeated hundreds and even thousands of times. Therefore, the optimization method based on mechanistic model is not suitable for online control purpose because the online optimization results must be obtained rapidly so that the operating conditions can be adjusted quickly enough 25‐27 . To this end, substituting the mechanistic model with machine learning model may be a solution because machine learning can reduce the simulation time greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%