2015
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2015.004717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line partial discharge defected phase selection and localization in cross-bonded single core cables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in this discrimination problem, energy‐based indices can intensify the difference between the sheath current of PD defective cable terminations and healthy ones, which facilitates the discrimination process. Though the authors have experienced different energy‐based indices [17] and [18], because of considerable difference of currents in different paths (shown in the previous section), the basic energy‐based index, that is, the cumulative signal energy (CSE), was found sufficient and efficient for discrimination between PD defective cable termination and healthy ones. This index is calculated by: CSEbadbreak=k=1Nendsig2kΔt,\begin{equation}CSE = \sum_{k = 1}^{{N_{end}}} {si{g^2}\left( {k\Delta t} \right)} ,\end{equation}where normalΔt$\Delta t$ is the time step, sigfalse(kΔtfalse)$sig( {k\Delta t} )$ denotes the considered sheath current signal.…”
Section: Proposed Discrimination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in this discrimination problem, energy‐based indices can intensify the difference between the sheath current of PD defective cable terminations and healthy ones, which facilitates the discrimination process. Though the authors have experienced different energy‐based indices [17] and [18], because of considerable difference of currents in different paths (shown in the previous section), the basic energy‐based index, that is, the cumulative signal energy (CSE), was found sufficient and efficient for discrimination between PD defective cable termination and healthy ones. This index is calculated by: CSEbadbreak=k=1Nendsig2kΔt,\begin{equation}CSE = \sum_{k = 1}^{{N_{end}}} {si{g^2}\left( {k\Delta t} \right)} ,\end{equation}where normalΔt$\Delta t$ is the time step, sigfalse(kΔtfalse)$sig( {k\Delta t} )$ denotes the considered sheath current signal.…”
Section: Proposed Discrimination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these networks contain 13 link‐boxes and 12 cable sections of 500 m single core cables for each phase. The parameters of each single core cable are extracted from [10].…”
Section: Basic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 7is then substituted into Equation (11) and the matrix form of the transmission coefficient T bond is obtained:…”
Section: Current Reflection At Cross-bonding Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an increasing area of interest, the distribution of PD signals on the three-phase cross-bonding wires can be used as an important tool for PD location and eliminating the external disturbance [11][12][13]. However, previous studies are mainly based on fixed simulation parameters or a determined experimental environment, without considering the impact of cable laying parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%