1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf03011899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On line ST-segment analysis for detection of myocardial ischaemia during and after coronary revascularization

Abstract: On line ST-segment analysis for detection of myocardial ischaemia during and after coronary revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ischaemic ECG changes can also be manifested by T wave abnormalities, but the interpretation of any ECG changes in the perioperative period remains difficult, especially after cardiac surgery as was noted by Dr. Ansley et al in their work also published in this issue of the Journal. 26 Concordance between the presence of perioperative ST segment abnormalities and regional wall motion dysfunction on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is far from being perfect. 27,28 Continuous monitoring cannot be considered a gold standard for identifying myocardial ischaemia in this setting and the article by Dr. Ansley et al therefore represents a comparison of systems for the detection of ECG changes and not of myocardial ischaemia per se.…”
Section: Detection Of Perioperative Myocardial Ischaemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ischaemic ECG changes can also be manifested by T wave abnormalities, but the interpretation of any ECG changes in the perioperative period remains difficult, especially after cardiac surgery as was noted by Dr. Ansley et al in their work also published in this issue of the Journal. 26 Concordance between the presence of perioperative ST segment abnormalities and regional wall motion dysfunction on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is far from being perfect. 27,28 Continuous monitoring cannot be considered a gold standard for identifying myocardial ischaemia in this setting and the article by Dr. Ansley et al therefore represents a comparison of systems for the detection of ECG changes and not of myocardial ischaemia per se.…”
Section: Detection Of Perioperative Myocardial Ischaemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their diagnostic value depends on the appropriate selection and combination of the rules and the method for the extraction of feature values used in the rules. Some rule-based techniques (LACHTERMAN et al, 1990a, b;VELDKAMP et al, 1994;ANSLEY et al, 1996;YANG, 1996) used the ST deviation from the isoelectric line, while others (WATANABE et al, 1980;WEISNER et al, 1982;HSIA et al, 1986) combined the ST deviation with ST segment slope and other parameters like the ST index, ST level and ST integral (or ST area). More specifically, if the slope is lower than a certain threshold and the ST deviation is higher than 0.1 mV then an ischaemic beat is detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V 5 lead is most sensitive to ST-segment changes, capturing 75% of events; V 4 captures about 60% of ST-segment changes; the other precordial locations are significantly less sensitive [ 11 ]. Most electrocardiography systems use computerised ST-segment algorithms that compare the ST-segment and the iso-electric point from the PR-interval [ 12 ]. In addition to electrocardiography, photoplethysmography and intraarterial blood pressure waveforms can be used to derive pulse rate that equals heart rate when the patient has no pulse deficit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%