1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(98)00017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On line surface roughness measurements using image processing towards an adaptive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, real-time measuring of surface roughness is difficult. Second, direct physical contact with high contact pressure is indispensable and the line samplings that may not necessarily represent the real characteristics of the surface [2]. Furthermore, the surface topography can only reproduced as a one-or two-dimensional profile and the overall measurements are extremely time-consuming processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, real-time measuring of surface roughness is difficult. Second, direct physical contact with high contact pressure is indispensable and the line samplings that may not necessarily represent the real characteristics of the surface [2]. Furthermore, the surface topography can only reproduced as a one-or two-dimensional profile and the overall measurements are extremely time-consuming processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non contact surface roughness measurement gains popularity among research community [2][3][4][5].In the recent years, the development of machine vision hardware and user friendly image processing technology has started new possibilities of surface roughness measurement. The surface roughness prediction is made possible with the features extracted from the surface image [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the surface roughness falls below 2.5 μm, the stylus instruments are affected by large system error. The major disadvantage for such methods is that they require directed physical contact and line sampling which may not represent the real characteristics of the surface [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%