1986
DOI: 10.1080/02331938608843131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On locally-Lipschitz quasi-differentiate functions in Banach-spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roughly speaking, it is based on the same philosophy of a ''differential calculus without linearity'', that is allowing a larger set of firstorder approximants than that of linear ones, but it involves a different approximation concept, relying on the use of Fre´chet bornology in the defining limit constructions. For this possibility, which according to results obtained in [1] becomes interesting only for non-locally Lipschitz functions as far as working in finite-dimensional spaces, a systematic analysis of advantages is still lacking, up to the author's…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roughly speaking, it is based on the same philosophy of a ''differential calculus without linearity'', that is allowing a larger set of firstorder approximants than that of linear ones, but it involves a different approximation concept, relying on the use of Fre´chet bornology in the defining limit constructions. For this possibility, which according to results obtained in [1] becomes interesting only for non-locally Lipschitz functions as far as working in finite-dimensional spaces, a systematic analysis of advantages is still lacking, up to the author's…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The purpose of the study exposed in the present article is essentially to carry on investigations on a differentiation notion that were undertaken in [1], in the light of certain recent achievements in variational analysis. Such differentiation notion is a natural strong variant of the well-known one of quasidifferentiability, this latter having been studied and employed in many researches collected in a good deal of works during the last two decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13, although Y = R in Ref. 13; therefore, its proof is omitted. The compactness of αB implies that there exists β ∈ (0, ηα/6Mk 1 ) such that f (x 0 + x, u) − f (x 0 + x, u 0 ) ≤ (η/3M) α, for all x ∈ αB, u ∈ B U (u 0 , β).…”
Section: If This Claim Is Not True Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the proof, we need the following proposition which is indicated by Theorem 2.1 in Ref. 13, although Y = R in Ref. 13; therefore, its proof is omitted.…”
Section: If This Claim Is Not True Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.1) f'(x;d) = p (d)-p_(d) = max <v,d> -max <w,d>, ve3f (x) we-af(x) where both of p^d) and p 2 (d) are sublinear operators, i.e., as the sum form of a pair of sublinear operator and superlinear operator, or as the difference form of two sublinear operators, [4], [8], [13]. This kind of structure of derivatives of quasidifferentiable function brings on that a quasidifferential of a quasidifferentiable function, called bidifferential also in [7], is not unique, but the quasidifferential class of equivalence of a quasidifferentiable function is unique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%