2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004114000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Loewy lengths of blocks

Abstract: We give a lower bound on the Loewy length of a p-block of a finite group in terms of its defect. We then discuss blocks with small Loewy length. Since blocks with Loewy length at most 3 are known, we focus on blocks of Loewy length 4 and provide a relatively short list of possible defect groups. It turns out that p-solvable groups can only admit blocks of Loewy length 4 if p = 2. However, we find (principal) blocks of simple groups with Loewy length 4 and defect 1 for all p ≡ 1 (mod 3). We also consider sporad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sheds new light on a couple of our earlier results in [24]. Firstly, we get the following, providing an alternative proof of [24,Proposition 4.12]:…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This sheds new light on a couple of our earlier results in [24]. Firstly, we get the following, providing an alternative proof of [24,Proposition 4.12]:…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Then we have O p ′ (H) = H, and H ≤ G being a characteristic subgroup, from O p ′ (G) = {1} we infer O p ′ (H) = {1}.By [26, Lemma 4.1] we have LL(B 0 (H)) = 4, where B 0 (H) is the principal block algebra of kH. Hence we have LL(P (k H )) ≤ 4, and thus from Proposition 3.2 we get that the heart S := H(k H ) of P (k H ) is simple; see also[24, Proposition 4.6]. Moreover, if S ∼ = k H , then from O p ′ (H) = {1} we conclude that H ∼ = C 3 , hence LL(B 0 (H)) = LL(P (k H )) = 3, a contradiction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But contrary to what was claimed in the first line of the proof of [5,Thm. 7.1], the same assertion for the case of defining characteristic does not follow from the work of Koshitani, Külshammer, and Sambale [2]. We thank Shigeo Koshitani and Jürgen Müller for pointing this out to us; see [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Finite groups G such that c 11 (G) = 2 when k has an odd prime characteristic p, are discussed in a recent paper [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%