2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-machine measurement of location errors on five-axis machine tools by machining tests and a laser displacement sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ibaraki et al [13] formulated the geometric errors of machines by using a LDS. Similar research achievements have also been published in [14,15,16]. Hong et al [17] developed a non-contact R-test device for calibrating the NC machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Ibaraki et al [13] formulated the geometric errors of machines by using a LDS. Similar research achievements have also been published in [14,15,16]. Hong et al [17] developed a non-contact R-test device for calibrating the NC machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The reason for this could be the manufacturing accuracy of the two rotating axis components and the assembly clearance between them. The reason for this also could be that during the long-term operation of the machine tool, the A-axis was geometrically displaced due to uncertainty factors such as the weight of machine itself and the inertia of workpiece under high-speed motions [33]. Displacements indirectly affected the position error of the C-axis.…”
Section: Analysis Of Average Position Error Of a And C Axesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time, an automatic error calibration scheme was adapted by Ibaraki [32], which used the trigger probe installed on the spindle of the machine tool to measure the space position of four standard blocks which were clamped on the C-axis worktable, and then the geometric error of the rotary axis was calibrated. Jiang [33] proposed a location error identification method using a touch-trigger probe and a test-piece on a five-axis machine tool with a tilting head. In their nature, all of these methods involve the contact detection of block standard parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ibaraki et al [12][13] presented a pyramidshaped machining test, and the test proposed by Velenosi et al [14] was analogous. Ibaraki et al [15] and Jiang et al [16] presented a simpler set of machining tests based on the same principle. Morimoto et al [17] presented a machining test based on a non-rotating tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%