2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00365-018-9429-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Mahler’s Transcendence Measure for e

Abstract: We present a completely explicit transcendence measure for e. This is a continuation and an improvement to the works of Borel, Mahler and Hata on the topic. Furthermore, we also prove a transcendence measure for an arbitrary positive integer power of e. The results are based on Hermite-Padé approximations and on careful analysis of common factors in the footsteps of Hata.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Theorem 3. These estimates follow from the proofs of Theorems 5.5 and 5.7 in [12], except that Theorem 5.1 should be modified a little [11]. The term k −1 ∆ |η| −1/2 M −1/2+ε only appears in the case in which k 2 η 2 M ≫ 1, in which case the relevant estimate (on p. 27 of [12]) is actually Furthermore, if we select X = 1/2, we can forget the first term.…”
Section: And Letmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof of Theorem 3. These estimates follow from the proofs of Theorems 5.5 and 5.7 in [12], except that Theorem 5.1 should be modified a little [11]. The term k −1 ∆ |η| −1/2 M −1/2+ε only appears in the case in which k 2 η 2 M ≫ 1, in which case the relevant estimate (on p. 27 of [12]) is actually Furthermore, if we select X = 1/2, we can forget the first term.…”
Section: And Letmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, we shall use the approximate functional equation to bound somewhat longer short exponential sums.When ∆ = M 2/3 this gives the upper bound ≪ M ϑ/3+4/9+ε , and so splitting a longer sum into sums of this length and estimating the subsums separately gives the following bound for longer sums.Actually, Theorem 1 is valid for a slightly larger range of ∆ than Theorem 5.5 in [12] is. In fact, with a minor modification [11], the proof of Theorem 5.5 of [12] can be easily modified to give the analogous result for holomorphic cusp forms:Theorem 3. Let us consider a fixed holomorphic cusp form of weight κ ∈ Z + for the full modular group with the Fourier expansion ∞ n=1 a(n) n (κ−1)/2 e(nz) for z ∈ C with ℑz > 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another little lemma from [7] gives a useful upper estimate: Lemma 8.3. [7] If y ≥ re r , where r ≥ e, then z(y) ≤ 1 + log r r y log y .…”
Section: Lemma 82 [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of explicit twin approximations (2), the works considering Baker-type lower bounds for linear forms have relied on Siegel's lemma; see Baker [1], Mahler [15], and, for a generalised transcendence measure of e, Ernvall-Hytönen et al [6]. In these Baker-type lower bounds the error terms are weaker than the corresponding ones in those transcendence measures that depend on the maximum height only (see Hata [11] and Ernvall-Hytönen et al [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%