2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Making Determinations of Quality in Teaching

Abstract: This article examines the notion of quality teaching, exploring its conceptual, empirical and normative properties. We begin by analyzing the concept of teaching, separating it into its task sense (what teachers try to do) and its achievement sense (the student learning that teachers foster). The analysis suggests that any determination of quality in teaching must account for both the worthiness of the activity (good teaching) as well as the realization of intended outcomes (successful teaching). Good teaching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
250
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
250
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Fullan and Stiegelbauer (1991) argued that successful change at the individual teacher level reflects three components: provision of materials, strategies (student, class, whole school, community) and beliefs, with teacher beliefs driving the actual change or initiative. The development of productive strategies and beliefs that are amenable to change are arguably built upon access to opportunities to develop good quality knowledge for teaching, such as subject-matter knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and knowledge of students and their characteristics, as canvassed in a large corpus of literature about teachers' knowledge (e.g., Feiman-Nemser, 2001;Fenstermacher & Richardson, 2005;Grossman, 1995;Grossman & Stodolsky, 1995;Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001;Shulman, 1986bShulman, , 1987. With the development of good quality knowledge for teaching, teachers are well-placed to have successful experiences, and in-turn, to develop good self-efficacy and agency for teaching.…”
Section: Teachers Are At the Core Of Promoting Mental Health In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fullan and Stiegelbauer (1991) argued that successful change at the individual teacher level reflects three components: provision of materials, strategies (student, class, whole school, community) and beliefs, with teacher beliefs driving the actual change or initiative. The development of productive strategies and beliefs that are amenable to change are arguably built upon access to opportunities to develop good quality knowledge for teaching, such as subject-matter knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and knowledge of students and their characteristics, as canvassed in a large corpus of literature about teachers' knowledge (e.g., Feiman-Nemser, 2001;Fenstermacher & Richardson, 2005;Grossman, 1995;Grossman & Stodolsky, 1995;Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001;Shulman, 1986bShulman, , 1987. With the development of good quality knowledge for teaching, teachers are well-placed to have successful experiences, and in-turn, to develop good self-efficacy and agency for teaching.…”
Section: Teachers Are At the Core Of Promoting Mental Health In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Fenstermacher and Richardson (2005) addressed the issue of quality in teaching they argued that it was useful to consider the nature of quality by working back from the specific features of examples generally recognised as indicating good quality teaching practice. We have taken such an approach here.…”
Section: Arguedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also applies to how teacher agency is understood with regard to teachers working with students in creative and dynamic ways (Fenstermacher & Richardson 2005). Currently, policy texts tend to reduce teacher agency into a variety of audit trails that underplay their ability to enact generative learning in classrooms with their students (Robertson 2012).…”
Section: Realising Socially Just Social Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%