2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-017-2036-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On $${\mathbb {Z}}_p$$ Z p -orbifold constructions of the Moonshine vertex operator algebra

Abstract: For p = 3, 5, 7, 13, we consider a Z p -orbifold construction of the Moonshine vertex operator algebra V ♮ . We show that the vertex operator algebra obtained by the Z p -orbifold construction on the Leech lattice vertex operator algebra V Λ and a lift of a fixed-point-free isometry of order p is isomorphic to the Moonshine vertex operator algebra V ♮ . We also describe the relationship between those Z p -orbifold constructions and the Z 2 -orbifold construction in a uniform manner. In Appendix, we give a char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. Since the statement is verified in the sense of vertex algebras in [ALY17], it suffices to transfer the claim to the conformal net setting. The work on "framed CFTs" from [Bis12, Chapter 7] verifies analytically the isomorphism (V Λ ) Z 2 ∼ = V ♮ .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. Since the statement is verified in the sense of vertex algebras in [ALY17], it suffices to transfer the claim to the conformal net setting. The work on "framed CFTs" from [Bis12, Chapter 7] verifies analytically the isomorphism (V Λ ) Z 2 ∼ = V ♮ .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the Leech case, Aut(V Λ ) is in fact equal to Λ.O(Λ) by [DN99, Theorem 2.1] and the fact the Leech lattice Λ has no roots (so that the connected Lie group group called "N " in [DN99] is just Λ). In the sense of vertex algebras, the following result is definitional for p = 2, conjectured in [FLM88,Tui92] for p ∈ {3, 5, 7, 13}, announced for p = 3 in [DM94], and proved in full in [ALY17]:…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], several constructions of V were given by cyclic orbifolds of odd prime order p on V Λ , and analyzed using cyclic orbifolds of order 2p in order to produce a comparison with the original order 2 orbifold construction of [27]. We will apply a similar method to produce actions of the monster on orbifolds over various rings.…”
Section: The Abe-lam-yamada Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I would like to thank Toshiyuki Abe for describing the constructions in [1] in detail at the "VOA and related topics" workshop at Osaka University in March 2017. I would also like to thank the anonymous referees for many helpful comments, and one referee in particular for their help with the proof of Lemma 2.13.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Our investigation of Z 2A has a natural generalization to Z pA with p a prime number dividing the order of the Monster group. For each such p, the Monster CFT is known to be self-dual under the Z pA orbifold [46,29,30,48,49]. 18 , which implies that the Monster CFT must have a duality defect belonging to a Z p Tamabara-Yamagami category.…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%