2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19315-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Maximum Common Subgraph Problems in Series-Parallel Graphs

Abstract: The complexity of the maximum common connected subgraph problem in partial k-trees is still not fully understood. Polynomial-time solutions are known for degree-bounded outerplanar graphs, a subclass of the partial 2-trees. On the other hand, the problem is known to be NP-hard in vertex-labeled partial 11-trees of bounded degree. We consider series-parallel graphs, i.e., partial 2-trees. We show that the problem remains NP-hard in biconnected seriesparallel graphs with all but one vertex of degree 3 or less. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common principle in comparing graphs is identifying correspondences between their nodes that optimally preserve the edge structure. The problem arises in various domains and variations have been studied under di erent terms such as maximum common subgraph isomorphism [114], network alignment [220], graph matching [72] or graph edit distance [178], often using di erent algorithmic approaches. These problems are NP-hard, and in practice, heuristics are widely applied.…”
Section: Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common principle in comparing graphs is identifying correspondences between their nodes that optimally preserve the edge structure. The problem arises in various domains and variations have been studied under di erent terms such as maximum common subgraph isomorphism [114], network alignment [220], graph matching [72] or graph edit distance [178], often using di erent algorithmic approaches. These problems are NP-hard, and in practice, heuristics are widely applied.…”
Section: Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that this approach is realized by the procedure MaximalIso(uv, u v , t), 7 return maximum entry in D which returns the unique maximal isomorphism that maps the two given edges according to the specified type. The algorithm can be implemented by means of a tree structure that encodes the neighboring relation between inner faces, e.g., SP-trees as in [6,7] or weak dual graphs similar to the approach of [13].…”
Section: Biconnected Mcis In Outerplanar Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BBP-MCES is not only computable in polynomial-time, but also yields meaningful results for cheminformatics. A polynomial-time algorithm was recently proposed for BBP-MCIS, which requires time O(n 6 ) in series-parallel and O(n 5 ) in outerplanar graphs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If two such components share a vertex, the corresponding B-vertices are connected through a C-vertex representing this shared vertex. The running time for MCST on BC-trees is an important factor for the total running time of MCS algorithms for outerplanar and series-parallel graphs like [2,13,18] compared to FOG's 481.3 ms. The speedup factor ranges from 24 to 59, with an average of 43.…”
Section: Experimental Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is directly relevant in various applications, where real-world objects like molecules or shapes are represented by (attributed) trees [16,20]. Moreover, it forms the basis for several recent approaches to solve MCS in more general graph classes, see [2,13,14,18]. Methods directly based on algorithms for rooted trees result in time O(n 4 ∆) by considering all pairs of possible roots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%