2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On mechanical mechanism of damage evolution in articular cartilage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current values were estimated from earlier studies and after several additional simulations (sensitivity analysis, ranges given in the methods), contrasting between the numerical predictions and experimental FCD decrease observations. In agreement with our values, previous studies have reported thresholds 15 , 17 , 29 and failure strains close to our values 13 , 14 , 16 , 50 . Likewise, other investigations have established similar fluid velocity values to predict bone formation and mass transport processes in cartilage 29 , 56 , 65 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The current values were estimated from earlier studies and after several additional simulations (sensitivity analysis, ranges given in the methods), contrasting between the numerical predictions and experimental FCD decrease observations. In agreement with our values, previous studies have reported thresholds 15 , 17 , 29 and failure strains close to our values 13 , 14 , 16 , 50 . Likewise, other investigations have established similar fluid velocity values to predict bone formation and mass transport processes in cartilage 29 , 56 , 65 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the broader field of material damage and failure, the effects of both inhomogeneous material properties and time-dependent processes are active areas of research, especially for soft materials, such as hydrogels. In layered systems, cracks have been observed to propagate toward and then along interfaces (Barthelat et al, 2016; Dunlop et al, 2011), which is not unlike the crack deflection often observed in articular cartilage (Jeffrey et al, 1995; Men et al, 2017; Thambyah et al, 2012), and may be related to the difference between surface-intact and -removed groups observed here. In hydrogels, both viscoelasticity and poroelasticity are known to modify the material failure and damage in complex ways (Bouklas et al, 2015; Fakhouri et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Many studies focused on the treatment of full-thickness defects and osteochondral defects. But most of the cartilage defects observed in OA joints are partial-thickness, such defects need to be studied as well due to their different nature and extent of tissue damage [ 153 , 154 ]. For each kind of cartilage defect, the most suitable treatment strategy should be deployed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%