2015
DOI: 10.4236/ojop.2015.44014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Merging Cover Inequalities for Multiple Knapsack Problems

Abstract: This paper describes methods to merge two cover inequalities and also simultaneously merge multiple cover inequalities in a multiple knapsack instance. Theoretical results provide conditions under which merged cover inequalities are valid. Polynomial time algorithms are created to find merged cover inequalities. A computational study demonstrates that merged inequalities improve the solution times for benchmark multiple knapsack instances by about 9% on average over CPLEX with default settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0-1 knapsack polyhedron as the most basic relaxation of a 0-1 integer program (IP) has attracted attention of many researchers over the years. In particular, developing facets for the 0-1 knapsack polyhedron has been extensively addressed over the past several decades see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] among many others. Most of the work in this direction has been focused on characterization of facets arising from lifting of the so-called minimal cover inequalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 0-1 knapsack polyhedron as the most basic relaxation of a 0-1 integer program (IP) has attracted attention of many researchers over the years. In particular, developing facets for the 0-1 knapsack polyhedron has been extensively addressed over the past several decades see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] among many others. Most of the work in this direction has been focused on characterization of facets arising from lifting of the so-called minimal cover inequalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%