2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-018-3306-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On midrange periodicities in solar radio flux and sunspot areas

Abstract: Using the Hilbert-Huang transform technique, we investigate the midrange periodicities in solar radio flux at 2800 MHz (F10.7) and sunspot areas (SAs) from February 1, 1947 to September 30, 2016. The following prominent results are found: (1) The quasiperiodic oscillations of both data sets are not identical, such as the rotational cycle, the midrange periodicities, and the Schwabe cycle. In particular, the midrange periodicities ranging from 37.9 days to 297.3 days are related to the magnetic Rossby-type wave… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smoothness of curve, in some cases, is affected by the presence of gap of data of some year's. So we can conclude, that when shorter duration components (less than 3 year) are suppressed than the periodic components of ∼11 yrs, which are also embedded in the analyzed rotation period data and their presence is perhaps due to the 11 yrs sunspot activity cycle, which can be seen in the temporal variation of rotation period of any solar layer (Chandra, & Vats 2011;Li et al 2012;Mei, Deng, & Wang 2018;Xu, Gao & Shi 2020).…”
Section: Correlation With Solar Activity Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smoothness of curve, in some cases, is affected by the presence of gap of data of some year's. So we can conclude, that when shorter duration components (less than 3 year) are suppressed than the periodic components of ∼11 yrs, which are also embedded in the analyzed rotation period data and their presence is perhaps due to the 11 yrs sunspot activity cycle, which can be seen in the temporal variation of rotation period of any solar layer (Chandra, & Vats 2011;Li et al 2012;Mei, Deng, & Wang 2018;Xu, Gao & Shi 2020).…”
Section: Correlation With Solar Activity Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The continuous temporal variation in synodic rotation period obtains through Lomb-Scargle Periodogram (LSP) analysis for each frequency during study period confirms the presence of prominent random component in the solar rotation (Figure 2). When scattered sidereal rotation period are smoothed to suppress the random component by taking 3-yr running mean, it hints the presence of longer duration periodic cycle, perhaps ∼11-yr Schwabe cycle (Mei, Deng, & Wang 2018) and ∼22 yrs Hale cycle (Xu, Gao & Shi 2020) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to current knowledge, there is no statistically significant impact of anthropogenic changes on the frequency of SSWs (e.g. Butchart et al, 2000;SPARC CCMVal, 2010;Mitchell et al, 2012;Hansen et al, 2014, Ayarzagüena et al, 2018. Moreover, some of the recent works show the enhancement of the frequency of SSWs under forcing of GHGs and ODSs (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The F10.7 radio flux differs by the nature from the Lyman-alpha flux and sunspot numbers (Bruevich et al, 2014;Mei et al, 2018). Thus, the information about correlation coefficients for the same database and method potentially can be useful to identify possible reasons of correlation.…”
Section: Data Method and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%