1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(97)00133-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On minimal cubature formulae for product weight functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first family is given by the "MorrowPatterson-Xu" points, which have been studied in the contexts of minimal cubature [27,17,44,1], interpolation [44,2] and hyperinterpolation [11,9,13]. The second family, termed the "Padua points", has been recently studied in the interpolation context [10,3,5,12,14].…”
Section: Nontensorial Clenshaw-curtis Cubaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first family is given by the "MorrowPatterson-Xu" points, which have been studied in the contexts of minimal cubature [27,17,44,1], interpolation [44,2] and hyperinterpolation [11,9,13]. The second family, termed the "Padua points", has been recently studied in the interpolation context [10,3,5,12,14].…”
Section: Nontensorial Clenshaw-curtis Cubaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20)) for odd n, and almost minimal (up to 1 node) for even n. We have termed them after Morrow and Patterson [27], who gave originally the explicit formula in the odd case, and Xu [44], who obtained the explicit formula for even instances ("even" and "odd" are interchanged here with respect the usual setting, which refers to degree of exactness 2n − 1). Formulas of this type, even in a more general setting, have been studied by various other authors, for example in [17,1]. The MPX (Morrow-Patterson-Xu) points are defined as union of the bidimensional Chebyshev-like grids…”
Section: The Morrow-patterson-xu Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suffices to establish (15) for f ∈ {T k : |k| ≤ 2n − 1}, since this set is an orthogonal basis of Π d n . In this case we have For the case of d = 2, Theorem 2.2 contains two distinct cubature formulae for σ = (E, E), (E, O), respectively, whose number of nodes are either equal to N * in (10) or N * + 1, those are the ones that have appeared in [14,22], and later in [1], as mentioned earlier. For d = 3, there are 4 distinct formulae for…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A close inspection of the factorization method shows that it actually allows us to derive cubature formulae of degree 2n − 1 for W d with roughly 2(n/2) d many nodes. This number of nodes is substantially less than n d of the product cubature formula or n d /2 d/2 of the formulae in [1], although it likely far from optimal as seen from (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus the number of nodes in (3.8) is minimal when m is even and k = 1 and is at most one more than the minimal number of nodes otherwise. Theorem 3.3 and a similar theorem of Bojanov and Petrova [3] combine to give a simpler formula for the coefficients c n,q in (3.3).…”
Section: Interpolation At the Geronimus Nodesmentioning
confidence: 90%