2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-010-1041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On modeling galaxy-scale strong lens systems

Abstract: I review methods for modeling gravitational lens systems comprising multiple images of a background source surrounding a foreground galaxy. In a Bayesian framework, the likelihood is driven by the nature of the data, which in turn depends on whether the source is point-like or extended. The prior encodes astrophysical expectations about lens galaxy mass distributions, either through a careful choice of model families, or through an explicit Bayesian prior applied to under-constrained free-form models. We can t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We took advantage of a dusty spiral galaxy, CLASH 2882 [37][38][39] , in our ALMA field-of-view to examine possible astrometric off- As can be seen from the HST morphology shown on Figure 1 Magnification factor. With our new spectroscopic redshift, we revisited the magnification calculations using all the mass models released in the framework of the Frontier Fields survey [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] 7 . In addition, we use our deep upper limit on dust continuum emission as well as our measurement of the [OIII] flux described above.…”
Section: -0198 Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took advantage of a dusty spiral galaxy, CLASH 2882 [37][38][39] , in our ALMA field-of-view to examine possible astrometric off- As can be seen from the HST morphology shown on Figure 1 Magnification factor. With our new spectroscopic redshift, we revisited the magnification calculations using all the mass models released in the framework of the Frontier Fields survey [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] 7 . In addition, we use our deep upper limit on dust continuum emission as well as our measurement of the [OIII] flux described above.…”
Section: -0198 Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When fitting the SIE, we vary the Einstein radius, position, ellipticity, shear, and the two corresponding position angles. We optimize these parameters simultaneously, first optimizing numerous random realizations of an SIE profile in the source plane, and then keeping and re-optimizing the best model in the image plane (see Keeton 2010).…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may consider the astrometry in Table 1 of Sergeyev et al (2016) and the lens magnification ratio we derive in Section 4, i.e., a macrolens flux ratio B/A = 0.64 ± 0.064, where the uncertainty is increased to 10% to take an unknown microlens effect into account. If we fit a singular isothermal ellipsoid (SIE) mass model to these observations (χ 2 ∼ 0), the LENSMODEL software (Keeton 2001(Keeton , 2010 produces an Einstein radius, ellipticity (position angle), and time delay of 1. 073, 0.034 (−28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%