2011
DOI: 10.5539/jmr.v3n4p31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Modeling the Volatility of Nigerian Stock Returns Using GARCH Models

Abstract: This study investigates the time series beaviour of daily stock returns of four firms listed in the Nigerian Stock Market from 2nd January, 2002 to 31st December, 2006, using three different models of heteroscedastic processes, namely: GARCH (1,1), EGARCH (1,1) and GJR-GARCH models respectively. The four firms whose share prices were used in this analysis are UBA, Unilever, Guiness and Mobil. All the return series exhibit leverage effect, leptokurtosis, volatility clustering and negative skewness, which are co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Student's-t distributional assumptions estimates was found to give best result in tandem with the findings of (Atoi 2014) for the period before the meltdown while the generalized error distribution gives the best estimate after the meltdown. The APARCH model provides the overall best estimate for all the periods which is in agreement with Atoi 2014, Rahman, Rahman andHossain (2013), but contrast the findings of Su (2010), Alberg, Shalit and Yosef (2008), Coffie (2015), Onwukwe, Bassey and Isaac (2011). In general the findings follows the assertion of Osarumwense (2015) that impact of good or bad news on return volatility do not only depend on the asymmetric model but also the choice of the error distribution matters.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Student's-t distributional assumptions estimates was found to give best result in tandem with the findings of (Atoi 2014) for the period before the meltdown while the generalized error distribution gives the best estimate after the meltdown. The APARCH model provides the overall best estimate for all the periods which is in agreement with Atoi 2014, Rahman, Rahman andHossain (2013), but contrast the findings of Su (2010), Alberg, Shalit and Yosef (2008), Coffie (2015), Onwukwe, Bassey and Isaac (2011). In general the findings follows the assertion of Osarumwense (2015) that impact of good or bad news on return volatility do not only depend on the asymmetric model but also the choice of the error distribution matters.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This model is identical to the GJR-GARCH except that the latter specifies conditional standard deviation rather than conditional variance. The effectiveness of these models to effectively capture the properties of time series has been substantiated by (Aggarwal, Inclan, & Leal, 1999;Alberg, Shalit, & Yosef, 2008;Onwukwe, Bassey, & Isaac, 2011) in their empirical studies.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings have crucial implications for domestic portfolio selection and management through the hedging opportunities available in the NSE sectors. Onwukwe et al (2011) investigated the time series behaviour of daily stock returns of four firms listed in the Nigerian Stock Market from 2nd January, 2002 to 31st December, 2006, using three different models of heteroscedastic processes, namely: GARCH (1,1), EGARCH (1,1) and GJR-GARCH models respectively. The four firms whose share prices were used in this analysis are UBA, Unilever, Guinness and Mobil.…”
Section: Empirical Review Of Nigeria Stock Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%