1989
DOI: 10.1086/261634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Money as a Medium of Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
702
2
13

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,073 publications
(726 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
702
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…11 If the disutility from balance adjustments was nonlinear, it would not be possible to achieve the first-best allocation in both the bilateral and the settlement stage. Thus, linearity is necessary in order to support the first-best in our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 If the disutility from balance adjustments was nonlinear, it would not be possible to achieve the first-best allocation in both the bilateral and the settlement stage. Thus, linearity is necessary in order to support the first-best in our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ Figure 2] Whilst the previous experiment does not aim to test any particular theory, in a pair of experiments the Kiyotaki and Wright (1989) model is tested. In this model money arises as a medium of exchange because of trading frictio ns existing in the economy.…”
Section: The Role Of Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the former class typically are used to study the origins of the medium of exchange (e.g., Jones, 1976;Niehans, 1978;Kiyotaki and Wright, 1989;Craig and Waller, 2000;Howitt and Clower, 2000), although some are used to study other questions (e.g., Cavalcanti, 1999). For our purposes, these models are not useful because either they are much too stylized to address the questions to be investigated here or they are analytically intractable and require numerical solution.…”
Section: Model Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their models are not suited to studying what characteristics determine which media a particular household will use. Kiyotaki and Wright (1989) and Craig and Waller (2000) restrict the analysis to households that demand only one good, making their models inappropriate for studying how the composition of consumption affects demands for multiple media of exchange. Cavalcanti (1999) allows for two media but restricts a given household a priori to using one or the other of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%