2000
DOI: 10.1109/9.880629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On multi-input chattering-free second-order sliding mode control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
188
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most effective consists in artificially increasing the relative degree of the system and designing Higher Order Sliding Mode (HOSM) control laws (Dinuzzo and Ferrara, 2009;Levant, 2003;Shtessel, Edwards, Fridman, and Levant, 2014;Shtessel, Fridman, and Zinober, 2008). Among the HOSM control laws, those of the second order (SOSM control laws) (see, for instance Bartolini, Ferrara, and Usai (1998c); Bartolini, Ferrara, Usai, and Utkin (2000)) are particularly suitable to be applied to microgrids in grid-connected mode since the original relative degree of the microgrid model is 1. Another source of uncertainty in microgrids is the fact that only the nominal values of the parameters of the grid and of the load are typically assumed perfectly known, and their variation could be unpredictable, making the definition of the bounds on the uncertain terms impracticable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most effective consists in artificially increasing the relative degree of the system and designing Higher Order Sliding Mode (HOSM) control laws (Dinuzzo and Ferrara, 2009;Levant, 2003;Shtessel, Edwards, Fridman, and Levant, 2014;Shtessel, Fridman, and Zinober, 2008). Among the HOSM control laws, those of the second order (SOSM control laws) (see, for instance Bartolini, Ferrara, and Usai (1998c); Bartolini, Ferrara, Usai, and Utkin (2000)) are particularly suitable to be applied to microgrids in grid-connected mode since the original relative degree of the microgrid model is 1. Another source of uncertainty in microgrids is the fact that only the nominal values of the parameters of the grid and of the load are typically assumed perfectly known, and their variation could be unpredictable, making the definition of the bounds on the uncertain terms impracticable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In either case, the method always produces a dynamic controller, contrary to the work by Lu and Spurgeon (1998) and SiraRamirez (1993). The proposed method combines elements from Sira-Ramirez (1993) and Lu and Spurgeon (1998) together with Chang (1990) and Bartolini et. al (2000) and is applicable to a wide class of systems which are not necessarily affine in the control.…”
Section: Supported By Epsrc Grant Reference Gr/m94021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of SMC is the so-called chattering phenomenon, i.e., oscillations of the controlled variable due to the discontinuity of the control input [Boiko et al, 2007;Levant, 2010]. The most effective solution to alleviate this phenomenon is the generation of higher order sliding modes (HOSM), which are able to reduce the chattering effect while maintaining good stability properties [Bartolini et al, 1998[Bartolini et al, , 2000Levant, 2003;Dinuzzo and Ferrara, 2009;Ferrara et al, 2014b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%