1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01682740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On multicyclic operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, if S is a semi-Fredholm operator such that σ(5) = σ(R) and ind S = h E Z', then S 7* R, whence we conclude that ρf_ F is discontinuous at R for all possible sets Σ. D According to [7] (Theorem 4 and its proof), given A in £(%), a point λ Gσ^) Π 3σ(,4),ε>0and/? ε β(ϋC), ||A|| < 1, there exists Λ(λ, ε, R) unitarily equivalent to…”
Section: Theorem 1 (I) σ 0 Is Continuous At a Et(%) If And Only If σ(mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, if S is a semi-Fredholm operator such that σ(5) = σ(R) and ind S = h E Z', then S 7* R, whence we conclude that ρf_ F is discontinuous at R for all possible sets Σ. D According to [7] (Theorem 4 and its proof), given A in £(%), a point λ Gσ^) Π 3σ(,4),ε>0and/? ε β(ϋC), ||A|| < 1, there exists Λ(λ, ε, R) unitarily equivalent to…”
Section: Theorem 1 (I) σ 0 Is Continuous At a Et(%) If And Only If σ(mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It was observed in [3] that both, σ and o w , are continuous on a dense subset and discontinuous on a dense subset (this last result depending on the proof of Theorem 4 in [7]). …”
Section: Theorem 1 (I) σ 0 Is Continuous At a Et(%) If And Only If σ(mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Proof. Since T is m-multicyclic, nullity(T * ) = m ( [14]). Moreover, by Corollary 3.4, one has H = {null(T * − µI) : µ ∈ D r } for all r > 0.…”
Section: Preliminaries In This Paper We Discuss the Following Fundamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore Proposition 3.1 shows that the spectral multiplicity of T F does not exceed N. On the other hand, the spectral multiplicity of an arbitrary operator T is greater than or equal to max dim Ker(T *&*) (see [9]). K This is not a best-possible result that guarantees that the commutant of a Toeplitz operator is abelian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%