2013
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2013.021213.122465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Multiple Users Scheduling Using Superposition Coding over Rayleigh Fading Channels

Abstract: Abstract-In this letter, numerical results are provided to analyze the gains of multiple users scheduling via superposition coding with successive interference cancellation in comparison with the conventional single user scheduling in Rayleigh blockfading broadcast channels. The information-theoretic optimal power, rate and decoding order allocation for the superposition coding scheme are considered and the corresponding histogram for the optimal number of scheduled users is evaluated. Results show that at opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the pdf and the cdf of the fading process are given by respectively, whereγ is the average power gain. The channel power gain and all the the other simulation parameters are the same as in [6]. We compare the schemes for three specific schedulers, namely hard fairness, proportional fairness and fixed weights.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the pdf and the cdf of the fading process are given by respectively, whereγ is the average power gain. The channel power gain and all the the other simulation parameters are the same as in [6]. We compare the schemes for three specific schedulers, namely hard fairness, proportional fairness and fixed weights.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the schemes for three specific schedulers, namely hard fairness, proportional fairness and fixed weights. These are the same as in [6]. However, the algorithms given in [6] for calculating the user weights for proportional fairness and hard fairness need to be slightly modified.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations