2013
DOI: 10.1145/2462896.2462899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On multiway cut parameterized above lower bounds

Abstract: We introduce a concept of parameterizing a problem above the optimum solution of its natural linear programming relaxation and prove that the node multiway cut problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) in this setting. As a consequence we prove that node multiway cut is FPT, when parameterized above the maximum separating cut, resolving an open problem of Razgon.Our results imply O * (4 k ) algorithms for vertex cover above maximum matching and almost 2-SAT as well as an O * (2 k ) algorithm for node multiway… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more desirable and stronger result would be a constant-factor approximation of the difference d between the optimal solution cost and a lower bound or a fixed-parameter tractability result with respect to the parameter d [6,11,17,24]. However, we show that such algorithms (presumably) do not exist.…”
Section: Parameterized Hardness and Inapproximabilitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A more desirable and stronger result would be a constant-factor approximation of the difference d between the optimal solution cost and a lower bound or a fixed-parameter tractability result with respect to the parameter d [6,11,17,24]. However, we show that such algorithms (presumably) do not exist.…”
Section: Parameterized Hardness and Inapproximabilitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Raman et al [29] gave a parameterized algorithm of running time O * (9 k ), using important separator and iterative compression technique. Based on LP-relaxation, Cygan et al [30] presented an O * (4 k ) time parameterized algorithm. By analyzing the LP value in LPrelaxation, Narayanaswamy et al [31] gave a parameterized algorithm of running time O * (2.6181 k ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php fiable. Lokshtanov et al [32] (improving earlier work [42,14,41]) gave an O * (2.3146 k ) time algorithm for the problem of deciding if a 2CNF formula can be made satisfiable by the deletion of at most k clauses; they call this problem Almost 2SAT. We need a variant of the result here, where instead of deleting at most k clauses, we are allowed to delete at most k variables.…”
Section: Finding a Shadowless Solution By Reduction Tomentioning
confidence: 99%