2010
DOI: 10.4171/jems/213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On nearly radial marginals of high-dimensional probability measures

Bo'az Klartag

Abstract: Abstract. Suppose that µ is an absolutely continuous probability measure on R n , for large n. Then µ has low-dimensional marginals that are approximately spherically-symmetric. More precisely, if n ≥ (C/ε) Cd , then there exist d-dimensional marginals of µ that are ε-far from being sphericallysymmetric, in an appropriate sense. Here C > 0 is a universal constant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carlen and D. Cordero-Erausquin [14], and J. Bennett, A. Carbery, M. Christ and T. Tao [7] in their study of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality. Moreover, the case when strict inequality holds for all subspaces in (1.3) for a measure μ is due to B. Klartag [27]. Isotropic measures on S n−1 are also discussed, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Carlen and D. Cordero-Erausquin [14], and J. Bennett, A. Carbery, M. Christ and T. Tao [7] in their study of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality. Moreover, the case when strict inequality holds for all subspaces in (1.3) for a measure μ is due to B. Klartag [27]. Isotropic measures on S n−1 are also discussed, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the aims of this paper is to extend work of Carlen and CorderoErausquin [11] for discrete measures, and Klartag [37] for arbitrary measures, and provide an answer to Problem 1.1.…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klartag [37] established that if a general measure satisfies the strict subspace concentration inequality, then it has an affine isotropic image.…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that the proof of Corollary 1.7 (or, equivalently, of Theorem 1.5) is based on high-dimensional phenomena, rather than concentration of measure (which is used to obtain the same result in the case of log-concave measures). Other results in the spirit of Corollary 1.7, where the log-concavity assumption on the measure may be relaxed, can be found in [15,24,16,17,18]. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%