2016
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1269846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On negative correlation: a comparison between Multinomial Probit and GEV-based discrete choice models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As significant t-statistics at the 0.01 level are shown in Tables 1 and 2, all negative covariance elements in covariance matrices of random error terms are correctly estimated, which indicates that the MMNP model can well accommodate various correlated error structures, even with negative correlations. It can perfectly avoid defects in previous MMNP models and mixed GEV models since error terms are assumed to be independent in previous MMNP models [12,13], and negative correlations cannot be accommodated in the mixed GEV models [15], which may lead to bias in model estimation [11].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As significant t-statistics at the 0.01 level are shown in Tables 1 and 2, all negative covariance elements in covariance matrices of random error terms are correctly estimated, which indicates that the MMNP model can well accommodate various correlated error structures, even with negative correlations. It can perfectly avoid defects in previous MMNP models and mixed GEV models since error terms are assumed to be independent in previous MMNP models [12,13], and negative correlations cannot be accommodated in the mixed GEV models [15], which may lead to bias in model estimation [11].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase of random coefficients, the integration will be more complicated with higher dimensions. Besides, GEV estimates are biased when negative correlations appear between choices [11]. However, modelers usually do not know the covariance structure in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this constraint on the scale parameters restricts that covariances to be non-negative (this should be clear from the expression in Proposition 2.1). Intuitively, the covariance between two error terms in a nested logit model is the variance of the nest specific error term of the shared nest which can not be negative; see Williams and Ortúzar (1982) for details and Dong et al (2017) for modeling implications. Furthermore by the same proposition, two alternatives are uncorrelated if the smallest partition containing both is the universal set C (or equivalently their youngest common ancestor is the root node).…”
Section: Technical Setup and Foundational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%