2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On noise covariance estimation for Kalman filter-based damage localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, collecting damage labels that describe locations of damage is expensive and often infeasible, making automatic damage localisation using a data-based approach to SHM rather challenging. In SHM, most data-driven damage localisation methods typically require a network of well-placed sensors close to the damage location in the structure of interest (Stubbs et al, 1995; Manson et al, 2003; Chesné and Deraemaeker, 2013; Wernitz et al, 2022). This approach can be expensive and time-consuming to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, collecting damage labels that describe locations of damage is expensive and often infeasible, making automatic damage localisation using a data-based approach to SHM rather challenging. In SHM, most data-driven damage localisation methods typically require a network of well-placed sensors close to the damage location in the structure of interest (Stubbs et al, 1995; Manson et al, 2003; Chesné and Deraemaeker, 2013; Wernitz et al, 2022). This approach can be expensive and time-consuming to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard SHM practices require a network of sensors placed in strategic positions in order to locate damage on a structure (Stubbs et al, 1995; Manson et al, 2003; Chesné and Deraemaeker, 2013; Wernitz et al, 2022). Consequently, large amounts of well-placed sensors and collected data are required for damage location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most commonly used estimators in this field, one can identify the Kalman filter (KF), the Extended KF (EKF), the Particle KF (PKF), and the Dual KF (DKF) while a combination of those estimators has also been used. For example, the authors of [3] developed a hybrid framework for simultaneously tracking states and estimating system parameters. This hybrid approach combined two filters, namely the EKF and the PKF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, diferent kinds of data-driven damage-sensitive features (DSFs) have been formulated [24], including the popular modal property-based methods [25][26][27] or more indirect signal processing-based methods [28][29][30]. On the other hand, time-domain damage identifcation schemes exist, on the basis of which acceleration and displacement-based damage indices (DI) [31][32][33] can be derived. Finally, traditional approaches, such as ftting of typical constitutive models, such as the Park-Ang model [34], have also been utilized for decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%