Fifty Years After the ‘‘Homage to Santa Rosalia’’: Old and New Paradigms on Biodiversity in Aquatic Ecosystems 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9908-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On non-Eltonian methods of hunting Cladocera, or impacts of the introduction of planktivorous fish on zooplankton composition and clear-water phase occurrence in a Mediterranean reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crawford et al ., ; Kadye & Booth, ). Likewise, the introduction of planktivorous fish causes the rapid elimination of large‐bodied zooplankton and their replacement by small‐bodied taxa that may not be reflected in diversity metrics (Ordóñez et al ., ). Furthermore, because of the strong trophic links established in aquatic communities, the impacts associated to the introduction of invasive species extend beyond simple changes in the abundance of particular functional groups, but can threat species interaction at the community level (Sanders et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crawford et al ., ; Kadye & Booth, ). Likewise, the introduction of planktivorous fish causes the rapid elimination of large‐bodied zooplankton and their replacement by small‐bodied taxa that may not be reflected in diversity metrics (Ordóñez et al ., ). Furthermore, because of the strong trophic links established in aquatic communities, the impacts associated to the introduction of invasive species extend beyond simple changes in the abundance of particular functional groups, but can threat species interaction at the community level (Sanders et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, changes in either primary producers or the input of limiting nutrients by invasive species affect the total energy available to the ecosystem, with ‘bottom‐up’ control propagating changes up the trophic ladder (Heath et al ., ). For example, the introduction of zooplanktivorous fish ( Rutilus rutilus and Alburnus alburnus ) into Spanish reservoirs caused a strong decrease in the abundance and richness of large‐bodied zooplankton, which in turn released phytoplankton from its grazing pressure (Ordóñez et al ., ). As opposed to predators, filter feeders like the zebra mussel ( Dreissena polymorpha ) are able to considerably reduce the abundance of phytoplankton (and also small zooplankton), with foreseeable negative consequences upon higher trophic levels (Ward & Ricciardi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…), channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque), black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque), goldfish] may be similar but have not been studied in this region (Braig & Johnson 2003; Rowe 2007). However, several studies have shown that zooplanktivorous NNFFs such as silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Val), rudd Scardinius erythropthalmus (L.) and bleak Alburnus alburnus (L.) have dramatically altered zooplankton biomass, structure and dynamics in Israel (Spataru & Gophen 1985) and Spain (Ordóñez et al. 2010).…”
Section: Ecosystem Alterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of non‐native species on ecosystem function also varies by trophic level, functional group, and the invader's ability to modify habitats (Gallardo et al, 2016). For example, top‐down effects can occur via the introduction of zooplanktivores (Ordóñez et al, 2010) or bottom‐up effects through the introduction of filter‐feeding planktivores (Ward & Ricciardi, 2007). Trait‐variation is also positively correlated with the invasability of a species, which generates cascading effects on recipient ecosystems (Evangelista, Lecerf, Britton, & Cucherousset, 2017; Mitchell & Bakker, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%