2019
DOI: 10.1137/16m1061928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Nonintrusive Uncertainty Quantification and Surrogate Model Construction in Particle Accelerator Modeling

Abstract: Using a cyclotron based model problem, we demonstrate for the first time the applicability and usefulness of an uncertainty quantification (UQ) approach in order to construct surrogate models. The surrogate model quantities for example emittance, energy spread, or the halo parameter, can be used to construct a global sensitivity model along with error propagation and error analysis. The model problem is chosen such that it represents a template for general high-intensity particle accelerator modelling tasks. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one downside of using a simple NN model is that it does not inherently give an estimate of prediction uncertainty and model sensitivity without additional analysis. In contrast, the PCE model has the benefit of providing straightforward estimates of prediction uncertainty and sensitivity via the Sobol' indices [25,39]. The PCE model also has fewer hyperparameters to tune (i.e., polynomial order, type of polynomial used).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, one downside of using a simple NN model is that it does not inherently give an estimate of prediction uncertainty and model sensitivity without additional analysis. In contrast, the PCE model has the benefit of providing straightforward estimates of prediction uncertainty and sensitivity via the Sobol' indices [25,39]. The PCE model also has fewer hyperparameters to tune (i.e., polynomial order, type of polynomial used).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the datasets, training procedures, implementations of the ML models and the GA, and the details of the physics simulations can be found in the Appendix. We first focus on artificial neural networks (NNs) to demonstrate the technique, and later briefly compare the results with those obtained from polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) [25,37] and support vector regression (SVR) models. The randomly varied inputs include the injector rf phase ϕ 1 and accelerating gradient G 1 , the linac cavity rf phase ϕ 2 and accelerating gradient G 2 , and two solenoid strengths K 1 and K 2 .…”
Section: B Validation Of ML Surrogate Modeling Approach For Optimizamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When K equals the cardinality of the design of experiment N , the validation method is called the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The implemented algorithm selects a single instance ξ k from 4 Any expansion implemented on a computer is actually truncated. the input set and computes the meta-model of the remaining set, i.e., M ξ − {ξ k } = Y k .…”
Section: Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surrogate modeling is one possible solution that is feasible and which provides a reliable method to quantify uncertainties and provides a sensitivity analysis at zero additional cost. The PCE method has been used in many engineering applications, such as modeling uncertainties in electric motors [3], and also in accelerator science [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%