2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On nonlinear cutting response and tool chatter in turning operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also shown that when inclination angle or nose radius exists on the tool, a multi-dimensional solution is needed since the SDoF stability formulation fails to represent the dynamics of the process accurately. Dassanayake [37] studied tool chatter with turning dynamics using a 3DoF model and also compared it with an SDoF model. In a 3DoF model the workpiece is modeled as a system of three rotors namely, machined, being machined, and unmachined regions connected by a flexible shaft.…”
Section: Analytical Models Based On the Number Of Dofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was also shown that when inclination angle or nose radius exists on the tool, a multi-dimensional solution is needed since the SDoF stability formulation fails to represent the dynamics of the process accurately. Dassanayake [37] studied tool chatter with turning dynamics using a 3DoF model and also compared it with an SDoF model. In a 3DoF model the workpiece is modeled as a system of three rotors namely, machined, being machined, and unmachined regions connected by a flexible shaft.…”
Section: Analytical Models Based On the Number Of Dofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Budak and Ozlu [35] used an accelerometer and AE sensors to verify a multi-dimensional chatter stability model which includes nose radius to the tool geometry. A sound measurement setup was used to measure the chatter frequency for comparing their SDoF and multidimensional models in [37]. Yu et al [94] found that when chatter occurs, significant vibrations in the system are established which can be detected using the sound pressure level from a microphone to determine precise chatter frequency.…”
Section: Sound and Acoustic Emission (Ae) Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seguy and Seguy [14] proposed a methodology of decision support for preventing chatter during milling operation. The turning process can be modelled according to the number of degrees of freedom (DOF) [15][16][17][18][19], tool and workpiece flexibilities [20][21][22] and tool wear and process damping [23][24][25]. A number of authors have used Nyquist plots and finite element analyses [26][27][28][29] and have performed experiments measuring force and vibration in an attempt to predict chatter stability [18,22,[30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the 3-D models have not considered torsional and gyroscopic effects. For instance, Dassanayake and Suh [16] studied tool chatter in turning using a 3DoF model. In their 3DoF model, the workpiece is modeled as a system of three rotors namely, machined, being machined and unmachined regions connected by a flexible shaft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%