2013
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2013.264.421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On nonlinear nonhomogeneous resonant Dirichlet equations

Abstract: We consider a (p, 2)-equation with a Carathéodory reaction f (z, x) which is resonant at ±∞ and has constant sign, z-dependent zeros. Using variational methods, together with truncation and comparison techniques and Morse theory, we establish the existence of five nontrivial smooth solutions (four of constant sign and the fifth nodal). If the reaction f (z, x) is C 1 in x ∈ ‫,ޒ‬ then we produce a second nodal solution for a total of six nontrivial smooth solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there have been some existence and multiplicity results for such operators. We refer to the works of Cingolani-Degiovanni [12], Medeiros-Perera [27], Papageorgiou-Smyrlis [30], and Sun [34]. ξ with 1 < p < ∞, then this map represents the generalized p-mean curvature differential operator defined by…”
Section: Mathematical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there have been some existence and multiplicity results for such operators. We refer to the works of Cingolani-Degiovanni [12], Medeiros-Perera [27], Papageorgiou-Smyrlis [30], and Sun [34]. ξ with 1 < p < ∞, then this map represents the generalized p-mean curvature differential operator defined by…”
Section: Mathematical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ϕ λ ∈ C 2 (W 1,p 0 (Ω)), from (31) and Papageorgiou and Smyrlis [29] (see also Papageorgiou and Rȃdulescu [26]) it follows that (32) C k (ϕ λ ,ŷ) = δ k,1 Z for all k 0.…”
Section: Near Resonance From the Left Ofλ 1 (P) >mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…From the proof of Proposition 26 (see the claim), we know that u 0 and v 0 are local minimizers of the functionalφ λ . Therefore From the proof of Proposition 26, we have C k (φ λ , y 0 ) = 0, ⇒ C k (φ λ , y 0 ) = δ k,1 Z for all k 0 (84) (see Papageorgiou and Smyrlis [29] and Papageorgiou and Rȃdulescu [26]).…”
Section: We Havementioning
confidence: 90%
“…So, if we let λ 0 = λ 0 * = max{λ 0 , λ * }, then we infer from (33) that σ + λ (τû 1 (p)) < 0 for all λ > λ 0 * , ⇒σ + λ (û * λ ) < 0 =σ + λ (0) for all λ > λ 0 * (see (30)), ⇒û * λ = 0 andû * λ ∈ Kσ+ λ for all λ > λ 0 * (see (30)), ⇒û * λ = u * λ for all λ > λ 0 * (see Claim 1). By (27)…”
Section: In a Similar Fashion We Show Thatmentioning
confidence: 97%