2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9582.00081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On noun phrase architecture, referentiality, and article systems

Abstract: Some languages have articles, others have not. This article argues that semantically equivalent noun phrases have the same underlying phrase structure across languages, no matter whether articles exist or not. The core idea is that functional categories are abstract syntactic heads correlated with specific referential categories. Presence vs. absence of a functional category determines whether or not its particular referential properties are found on the noun phrase. The functional heads are found universally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
17
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly however, we follow Vangsnes (1999Vangsnes ( , 2001 in assuming that when a functional head is present, it is subject to a general licensing condition, termed 'identification', which requires that some overt material be merged either in its specifier or head position at some step in the derivation. A similar idea is presented in Holmberg (1994).…”
Section: ð19þ ½ Cp Intðerrogativeþ Topðicþ Focðusþ Wh Finðitenessþ ½ Ipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly however, we follow Vangsnes (1999Vangsnes ( , 2001 in assuming that when a functional head is present, it is subject to a general licensing condition, termed 'identification', which requires that some overt material be merged either in its specifier or head position at some step in the derivation. A similar idea is presented in Holmberg (1994).…”
Section: ð19þ ½ Cp Intðerrogativeþ Topðicþ Focðusþ Wh Finðitenessþ ½ Ipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may however not be immediately clear why sominsertion should follow from (52ii). A crucial premise in this respect is that we consider som a 'functional element' in the sense of Vangsnes (1999Vangsnes ( , 2001, i.e., on a par with expletives and articles. 15 Unlike 'substantive elements', functional elements are accessible throughout the derivation and need not be a part of the initial numeration.…”
Section: Som-insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for such situations, competition among candidate lexicalizers is invoked. In recent papers this has been referred to as 'minimize junk' or 'best t' (see Starke 2009), and the general idea is similar to the earlier notion Prefer red Identi er advocated in Vangsnes (1999Vangsnes ( , 2001). …”
Section: Competition Preference and Optionalitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As discussed in Vangsnes (2008aVangsnes ( , 2008bVangsnes ( , 2008cVangsnes ( , 2013 in Norwegian dialects and colloquial Icelandic the item used in and questions can also be used adnominally. Furthermore, in some dialects the adnominal use is compatible with just interpretations (e.g.…”
Section: K Versus Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation