2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On numerical realizability of thermal convection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(149 reference statements)
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both benchmarks represent viable elements of nonhydrostatic dynamics affecting predictability of natural weather at larger meso and synoptics scales. For instance, dissipative effects within the planetary boundary layer are important for developing convective structures aloft [20], the interaction of which with deep gravity wave modes in the free troposphere can modulate the organization of the cloud clusters at larger scales [10,1]. The finite-amplitude effects related to topographically forced stably stratified flows, such as wave breaking and downslope windstorms or more generally mountain-wave induced turbulence, present obvious challenge for mesoscale weather predictability [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both benchmarks represent viable elements of nonhydrostatic dynamics affecting predictability of natural weather at larger meso and synoptics scales. For instance, dissipative effects within the planetary boundary layer are important for developing convective structures aloft [20], the interaction of which with deep gravity wave modes in the free troposphere can modulate the organization of the cloud clusters at larger scales [10,1]. The finite-amplitude effects related to topographically forced stably stratified flows, such as wave breaking and downslope windstorms or more generally mountain-wave induced turbulence, present obvious challenge for mesoscale weather predictability [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anelastic equations (1)-(3) assume nonrotating Boussinesq limit with constant reference profiles Θ o (z) = Θ 0 and ρ o (z) = ρ 0 . The growth of the convective boundary layer is driven by a prescribed diabatic source in (2), D Θ = −dH/dz, with a heat flux specified as Because these diabatic/viscous forcings quickly decay with height, they only parametrize nearsurface effects; whereas subgrid-scale modeling aloft is delegated to dissipative properties of MPDATA [23,20].…”
Section: Convective Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EULAG experience garnered over a wide range of hydrodynamical multiscale flow simulations indicate that its underlying advective scheme operates as adaptive subgrid model, turning on wherever and whenever dissipation is required to maintain stability, and remaining minimally dissipative otherwise (Smolarkiewicz & Margolin 2007;Piotrowski et al 2009). Moreover, when it activates, dissipation is concentrated at the smallest scales resolved by the spatial mesh.…”
Section: The Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1a), (1b) and (1d) represent sub-grid (turbulent) dissipation of momentum and diffusion of heat, with the symbols τ , h and j denoting the deviatoric stress tensor, the heat flux vector and the scalar diffusion flux vector, respectively. Here, the latter are modelled by means of an eddy viscosity/diffusivity assumption with dissipation/diffusion coefficients proportional to the square root of the prognostic "turbulent kinetic energy" (TKE) (Schumann, 1991;Piotrowski et al, 2009). The prognostic equations of the governing set (1) can be written in a generic conservation law form…”
Section: Eulag-lcmmentioning
confidence: 99%