1996
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(96)00718-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On obtaining surface time profiles from pulsed molecular beam scattering time-of-flight measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the low-energy beam, we can neglect impulsive scattering such that the entire TOF profile consists of a series of time-shifted Maxwell−Boltzmann distributions weighted by the probability, p des ( t s ), that molecules in the incident gas pulse desorb from the surface at the time t s : where N MB is a Maxwell−Boltzmann distribution at the temperature of the surface and t s is the residence time of the molecules on the surface. ,,, We found that the TOF data are best described by a desorption probability function, p des ( t s ), of the form: The parameters A and B and time constants τ 1 and τ 2 were found using a nonlinear least-squares procedure . The desorption probability curves that provide the best fits to the N ( t ) data (see Figure ) are plotted in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the low-energy beam, we can neglect impulsive scattering such that the entire TOF profile consists of a series of time-shifted Maxwell−Boltzmann distributions weighted by the probability, p des ( t s ), that molecules in the incident gas pulse desorb from the surface at the time t s : where N MB is a Maxwell−Boltzmann distribution at the temperature of the surface and t s is the residence time of the molecules on the surface. ,,, We found that the TOF data are best described by a desorption probability function, p des ( t s ), of the form: The parameters A and B and time constants τ 1 and τ 2 were found using a nonlinear least-squares procedure . The desorption probability curves that provide the best fits to the N ( t ) data (see Figure ) are plotted in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given the noise in the FTIR measurements, direct deconvolution is not practical in this case. A robust numerical procedure is to use a model function for NO resp (DED) and to perform the integration in Equation (10) numerically 12. The data fitting is carried out in two stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the analysis procedures for obtaining from the measured T (t) has been given elsewhere. 43 The T s (t) most robust process is to supply a model form for the surface time proÐle and to perform the convolution integration T s (t) numerically to obtain T (t)Èwhich is then compared with the measured TOF. The shape of is adjusted to obtain the T s (t) best agreement.…”
Section: Gacl and Tof Distributions Asmentioning
confidence: 99%