This paper treats the fuel optimal control of dynamic systems based on three cost functions. The three cost functions are a saturation condition, pesudofuel, and absolute fuel. They lead to bang-bang control, continuous control, and impulse control, respectively. A comparison of fuel consumption based on absolute fuel reveals that impulse control consumes 35% less fuel than continuous control in the case of controlling a linear damped harmonic oscillator. Impulse control consumes 33% less fuel than continuous control in the case of a rest-to-rest rigid-body maneuver. This result suggests the potential for fuel savings in larger order systems through the implementation of impulsive control strategies.