2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On one approach to the optimization of low-thrust station keeping manoeuvres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the nominal orbit for disturbanceacceleration prediction in (15) due to the nonlinearity of the analytical expressions in (9). Since the nominal orbit is known in advance, a p,k can be predicted.…”
Section: A State Space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the nominal orbit for disturbanceacceleration prediction in (15) due to the nonlinearity of the analytical expressions in (9). Since the nominal orbit is known in advance, a p,k can be predicted.…”
Section: A State Space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, much of the research on low-thrust SK has been on openloop optimal maneuver design, see, e.g. [8], [9]. However, given the desire to place geostationary satellites in tight longitudinal windows as required for satellite co-location, the corresponding mission autonomy requirements, and the overall density of the GEO belt, developing the capability for fine closed-loop control is attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The state constraints are handled by mean of the penalization term described by Equation (22) added to the objective function. The new objective function for the step (C) of the decomposition method reads thus: (39) with µ 3 a parameter that balance the objective function between the fuel consumption minimization and the stay in the SK window.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Commutation Times With The Switched Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of techniques for solving the resulting optimal sta-tion keeping control problem exist. When the thrust is considered as impulsive or when simple models are used to describe the disturbing forces, analytical solutions provide control laws, as in [22]. Otherwise, it is necessary to resort to numerical methods, such as direct collocation based methods as described in [23,24,25,26,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When simplifying assumptions are used, analytical control laws may be obtained, as in Sukhanov and Prado (2012). Otherwise, it is in general necessary to resort to numerical methods, such as direct collocation based methods as described in Hull (1997) and Betts (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%