1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf01602645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
381
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 572 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
381
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In that paper the author generalized to the three-dimensional dynamic case the rod models earlier proposed in [35,36]. In these works, the Euler-Bernoulli hypothesis, for which there can be no shears of the beam cross section with respect to the axis, is removed and it is assumed that the cross section remains planar during the deformation but not necessarily orthogonal to the rod axis (Timoshenko-Reissner model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that paper the author generalized to the three-dimensional dynamic case the rod models earlier proposed in [35,36]. In these works, the Euler-Bernoulli hypothesis, for which there can be no shears of the beam cross section with respect to the axis, is removed and it is assumed that the cross section remains planar during the deformation but not necessarily orthogonal to the rod axis (Timoshenko-Reissner model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6)- (8) and retaining terms of the same order, approximated equation are deduced. Finally, we stress that the advantage of having a hierarchy of approximated models relies on the possibility of choosing the more suitable set of equations for a given problem, at the less computational cost for the desired level of accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, constitutive equations must be either introduced on an axiomatic way or experimentally established. For considerations on how to obtain constitutive equations, see [8].…”
Section: A Remark On the Moment-curvature Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory mainly targets the set of structures that are subjected to small strains (elastic response) but arbitrarily large deformations, such a scenario occurs in such essentially one-dimensional structures, implying that the cross-sectional dimension is much smaller than its length [2]. The work on the theory of geometrically exact beams was mainly contributed by Timoshenko, Iura and Atluri [3], Simo and Vu-Quoc [4], and Reissner [5][6][7], which are all based on the work of Euler beam theory, with more modern work by Kirchhoff, Love [8], and most importantly by Cosserat and Cosserat [9]. There is substantial literature on Cosserat theories including that by Rubin [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%