2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On optimal orthogonal transforms at high bit-rates using only second order statistics in multicomponent image coding with JPEG2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, after the 2D DWT, the variance of the wavelet coefficients depends on the subband they belong to (even for Gaussian data) and the KLT does not capture these various variances, while the EBCOT coder with its PCRD optimizer performing simultaneously across all the codeblocks from the entire image take them into account. In (Akam Bita et al, 2010b), the authors introduced an orthogonal spectral transform (called JADO for Joint Approximate Diagonalization under Orthogonality constraint) using only second order statistics that has not this shortcoming, and that is optimal at high bit-rates for the JPEG2000 Part 2 compression scheme, when the data are Gaussian. They showed on natural hyperspectral images that JADO (resp.…”
Section: Discrete Wavelet Transform and Optimal Spectral Transform Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, after the 2D DWT, the variance of the wavelet coefficients depends on the subband they belong to (even for Gaussian data) and the KLT does not capture these various variances, while the EBCOT coder with its PCRD optimizer performing simultaneously across all the codeblocks from the entire image take them into account. In (Akam Bita et al, 2010b), the authors introduced an orthogonal spectral transform (called JADO for Joint Approximate Diagonalization under Orthogonality constraint) using only second order statistics that has not this shortcoming, and that is optimal at high bit-rates for the JPEG2000 Part 2 compression scheme, when the data are Gaussian. They showed on natural hyperspectral images that JADO (resp.…”
Section: Discrete Wavelet Transform and Optimal Spectral Transform Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, codecs based on these methods have generally a lower complexity than codecs using vectorial quantization before entropy coding. Thus, research activities on multicomponent image codecs based on transform and/or subband coding have been strengthened these last years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The JPEG2000 (JP2K) Part 2 standard implements such a method with two variants for reducing spectral redundancies: by applying either a 1-D linear transform, or a 1-D discrete wavelet transform (DWT) between the components of the encoded image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, after the 2D DWT, the variance of the wavelet coefficients depends on the subband they belong to and the KLT does not capture these various variances, while the EBCOT coder with its PCRD optimizer take them into account. In [11], the authors introduced an orthogonal spectral transform (called JADO) using only second order statistics that has not this shortcoming, and that is optimal at high bitrates for Gaussian data. They showed on natural hyperspectral images that OrthOST performs slightly but significantly better than JADO, which performs better than the KLT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such algorithms typically suffer a small performance penalty in lossless coding performance compared to algorithms that focus exclusively on lossless coding. A common approach that achieves good performance in lossy-to-lossless coding is to utilize a one-dimensional transform to exploit the correlation between spectral bands, followed by encoding each resulting band with a lossy-to-lossless 2D image coder [2], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of being necessary, (18) and (19) can be trivially adapted for ultraspectral images of more than 2 16 components, at the expense of larger values of minimum Θ. For a number of levels L,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%