2010
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2010.2045394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Optimal Scheduling Algorithms for Small Generalized Switches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inequality (b) follows from the bound on drift of V (.) obtained in (9) in the proof of the proof of Proposition 2; (c) follows from the fact that we use MaxWeight scheduling. Since λ ∈ int(C), there exists a ǫ 1 > 0 such that λ + ǫ 1 1 ∈ C. This gives (d).…”
Section: B Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Inequality (b) follows from the bound on drift of V (.) obtained in (9) in the proof of the proof of Proposition 2; (c) follows from the fact that we use MaxWeight scheduling. Since λ ∈ int(C), there exists a ǫ 1 > 0 such that λ + ǫ 1 1 ∈ C. This gives (d).…”
Section: B Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Inequality (b) follows from the bound on drift of V (.) obtained in (10) in the proof of the proof of Proposition 2; (c) follows from the fact that we use MaxWeight scheduling. Since λ ∈ int(C), there exists a 1 > 0 such that λ + 1 1 ∈ C. This gives (d).…”
Section: Appendix B: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The main challenge in our proof is due to the difficulty in characterizing the behavior of the queue length process under such a multi-dimensional state-space collapse. Characterizing the behavior of the queue lengths under multi-dimensional state-space collapse has been difficult, in general, except in rare cases; see [9,10] for two such examples in other contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest of the proof follows the same line of reasoning as in the proof of Proposition 1 to bound ∆V (k) ⊥ (Q) by utilizing (18). However, before we start analyzing the mean conditional drift of ∆W (Q (k) ) and ∆W (Q (k) ), we note the important new fact that: since λ (k) is in the relative interior of F (k) , there exists a small enough δ (k) > 0 such that the set…”
Section: State-space Collapse For the Scheduling Problem Under The Mwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, utilizing the bounds (28) and (29) in (18), and canceling common terms, yields the following bound on the conditional mean drift of V…”
Section: State-space Collapse For the Scheduling Problem Under The Mwmentioning
confidence: 99%