Proceedings of the 1996 ICPP Workshop on Challenges for Parallel Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icpp.1996.538556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On optimal size and shape of supernode transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To present our analysis, the following additional notation is used (it was first introduced in [13]). The column vector l ¼ ½l 1 ; :::; l n T is called supernode side length vector.…”
Section: Matrix H Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To present our analysis, the following additional notation is used (it was first introduced in [13]). The column vector l ¼ ½l 1 ; :::; l n T is called supernode side length vector.…”
Section: Matrix H Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of the supernode transformation may be used to tune the balance between computation and communication in order to minimize the total execution time of a parallel program. Supernode transformation was proposed in [17] and has been studied in [1], [4], [3], [2], [5], [15], [9], [13], [14], [12], [10], [11], [16], [19], [20], [22], [27], [29], [28], etc., to reduce communication overhead, synchronization overhead, or memory hierarchy inefficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%