“…For concise reviews and resources on planning, modeling, and analyzing the step‐stress ALT, readers are referred to Nelson, Meeker and Escobar, Bagdonavicius and Nikulin, Collins et al, and Limon et al Furthermore, due to time and resource constraints, censored sampling is usually necessary in practice, and in particular, a generalized censoring scheme known as progressive type I censoring allows functional test units to be withdrawn successively from the experiment at some prefixed nonterminal time points. Those withdrawn unfailed units can be used in other tests in the same or at a different facility; see, for instance, Cohen, Lawless, and Balakrishnan et al Despite its flexibility and efficient utilization of the available resources compared with the conventional sampling methods, progressively censored sampling has not gained much popularity in ALT, partly due to its complicated likelihood function rendering its statistical analysis rather difficult or mathematically intractable; see Balakrishnan, Pradhan and Kundu, Cramer and Iliopoulos, and Bhattacharya et al …”