2012
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On orthogonality constrained multiple core‐hole states and optimized effective potential method

Abstract: An attempt to construct a multiple core-hole state within the optimized effective potential (OEP) methodology is presented. In contrast to the conventional Δ-self-consistent field method for hole states, the effects of removing an electron is achieved using some orthogonality constraints imposed on the orbitals so that a Slater determinant describing a hole state is constrained to be orthogonal to that of a neutral system. It is shown that single, double, and multiple core-hole states can be treated within a u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was applied successfully for the ground state calculations of atoms and molecules, excited state exchange‐only OEP calculations as well as for incorporating static correlation effects . It was also appropriate for core hole excited and ionized states . In the present implementation of the CI subspace theory, we shall use the above potential and the parameters of Veff(r) will be chosen so that the functional F(φ1,φ2,φN+n), defined earlier, takes its minimum value for the eigenstates φi produced by the one particle Schroedinger equation 122φi(r)+Veff(r;C,dk)φi(r)=iφi(r) …”
Section: Effective Local Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was applied successfully for the ground state calculations of atoms and molecules, excited state exchange‐only OEP calculations as well as for incorporating static correlation effects . It was also appropriate for core hole excited and ionized states . In the present implementation of the CI subspace theory, we shall use the above potential and the parameters of Veff(r) will be chosen so that the functional F(φ1,φ2,φN+n), defined earlier, takes its minimum value for the eigenstates φi produced by the one particle Schroedinger equation 122φi(r)+Veff(r;C,dk)φi(r)=iφi(r) …”
Section: Effective Local Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experience of such calculations shows that the minimum is provided by the choice = ; i.e., all occupied molecular orbitals (MO) of the αcluster for the ES should be orthogonal to the α-spin highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the ground state. Therefore, we make the replacement and orthogonality requirement (11) becomes (12) Note that the requirements are easily generalized to the case of doubly excited states [28] and the "hole" states obtained by exciting (removing) electrons from inner shells (for example, the K-shell [29][30][31]). Requirement (12) can also be extended to higher ESs.…”
Section: Spectroscopy Of Atoms and Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In concluding this subsection, it is worth noting that the LSCF method is closely related to the projection operator technique (e.g., Ref. [46]). This technique deals with the modified operator F mod 5 I2P ð ÞF I2P ð Þ and can be considered as well as the LSCF approach as a benchmark for solving orthogonality constraint problems.…”
Section: Ap Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%